Linguistic anthropology at the University of Michigan

Linguistic form and social action
(Michigan discussions in anthropology 13)

“The theme for this volume, ‘Linguistic Form and Social Action,’ emerged in continuing conversations among graduate students affiliated with the Linguistic Anthropology program. Initially, these conversations focused on the theoretical utility of close-grained linguistic analysis for ethnographic research. However, we soon moved beyond these theoretical discussions and turned our attention towards the practical difficulties that linguistic anthropologists face in resolving tensions between micro- and macro-analytic methodologies.

“The editorial committee devoted considerable thought to our use of the words ‘form’ and ‘formal.’  In advocating the combined use of both ethnographic and ‘formal linguistic’ methods, we emphasize the value of incorporating the study of linguistic forms, including syntax, phonology, semantics, and pragmatics in achieving analytically rich ethnographic description. At the same time, we seek to bring the study of linguistic form, which has often denied the importance of broader social and cultural contexts of the utterance, into an essentially contextual theoretical space, explicitly acknowledging that these forms can not function, and therefore can not be studied independently of concurrent social systems. From the Introduction

 

Printable order form (in Acrobat format)  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Home