|
Repeatability:
|
May not be repeated for credit.
|
- Why are truth, justification, knowledge, and certainty valuable, if they are?
- How can you search for truth in a rationally responsible way?
- How can you even start out? Do you have a priori knowledge — or a priori reasons for beliefs — about logic, or necessary truths and falsehoods, or definitions, or your own mind? And how can you proceed?
- Are there any basic methodological principles (e.g., choosing more probable, simpler, more explanatory, or more familiar beliefs over their competitors) that can be defended in a purely epistemic way (as guides to the truth), or are they all merely pragmatic at root (e.g., easy, pleasant, elegant)?
- How should the various principles be elaborated and weighed against one another?
- Can any of this persuade various philosophical skeptics? Can any of this help guide real ongoing research?
- Can any of this apply to searches for evaluative (e.g., ethical) truth?
Course Requirements: No data submitted Intended Audience: No data submitted Class Format: No data submitted
|