Updated October 2013
Approved August 2014
Within the College of Literature, Science, and the Arts, instructors are expected to set fair and consistent grading procedures for their respective courses. The key to implementing fair grading procedures in courses across the College is that individual instructors adhere to grading rubrics that are applied evenly and consistently to all students within a respective course. If the grading rubric is used consistently for each student, then the final grade is assumed to be the correct grade. Nevertheless, students can inquire about a grade and subsequently initiate a grade grievance when they think that the grade was unfairly given.
1) Consultation with Instructor
The first step in inquiring about the accuracy of a final grade should be directed to the lead instructor of the course. This initial inquiry should take place within the first fifteen University business days of the first full term following the term in which the disputed grade was issued. If, after this inquiry, the student is not satisfied with the instructor’s response, the student may choose to initiate a formal grade grievance. To initiate a formal grade grievance for a course for which Linguistics is the home department, the student should contact the Linguistics Undergraduate Chair before the end of the fifth week of classes in the first full term following the term in which the disputed grade was issued.
2) Formal complaint to the Linguistics Undergraduate Chair
To initiate the formal grade grievance process, the student must convey in writing the basis for the complaint, with specific evidence in support of the argument that the grade either was given in error or was unfairly determined. This formal complaint also should summarize the outcome of the initial inquiry to the course instructor, indicating what aspects are in dispute. Upon receipt of the written complaint, the Undergraduate Chair will ask the instructor to provide a written summary restating how the final grade was determined and to respond to the specific claims made by the student.
After receiving this information from both the student and the instructor, the Undergraduate Chair will then determine if sufficient evidence exists to convene the Department’s Executive Committee. If the Undergraduate Chair determines that there is insufficient evidence for the grade grievance, the matter is considered closed, and the original grade stands.
If the Undergraduate Chair determines that the grade grievance should proceed, a date for a formal hearing with the Linguistics Department Executive Committee will be set.
3) Grade Grievance Hearing
In advance of the formal hearing, both the student filing the grade grievance and the respective instructor will be provided with copies of the written student complaint and the instructor’s summary in advance of the formal hearing. During the formal hearing, the student will be asked to first present the basis of his or her complaint; the instructor will then be asked to present his or her explanation for how grades were determined. Following an open period of questions to all parties, i.e., the student, the instructor and the Executive Committee members, the formal hearing will be adjourned.
4) Executive Committee’s Recommendation
The Executive Committee will then have ten University business days to determine its recommendation and submit a written report to the Undergraduate Chair.
If the Executive Committee decides that a grade change is not warranted, the Undergraduate Chair will convey this in writing to the student and the instructor. The original grade will stand and the matter is considered closed.
If the committee recommends a grade change, the Undergraduate Chair will communicate that decision directly to the instructor. The instructor will then be asked to respond in writing within five University business days to the Undergraduate Chair indicating whether or not he/she will abide by the Executive Committee’s recommendation. If the instructor agrees to a grade change, the Undergraduate Chair will inform the student, in writing, of the instructor’s decision and the student’s final course grade will be changed. The matter is considered closed.
If an instructor does not accept the Executive Committee’s recommendation to change the final grade, the original grade will stand. By College policy, a final course grade rests solely with the instructor and, as such, a course grade cannot be changed without the instructor’s consent. When this occurs, the Undergraduate Chair will convey in writing this decision to the student. The matter is considered closed. There is no appeal beyond the Department.
LSA Faculty & Staff
- Academic Affairs
- Budget and Finance
- Chairs and Directors
- Development, Marketing & Communications (DMC)
- Expect Respect
- Facilities & Operations
- Graduate Education
- Human Resources
- Information Technology (LSA IT)
- Instructional Support Services (ISS)
- Key Administrators
- Management Information Systems (MIS)
- Office of the Dean
- Security and Safety
- Shared Services
- Standard Practice Guide
- Student Academic Affairs
- About Dean Nurse
- About Student Academic Affairs
- Message from the Assistant Dean
- Staff List
- Organizational Chart
- Calendar of Events
- Letters to Faculty and Instructional Staff
- Academic Calendars
- Academic Judiciary
- Dean's Files
- Disruptive Students
- Grade Grievance
- Final Exams
- Religious Holidays
- Student Class Attendance
- Undergraduate Academic Progress Report
- Testing Accommodation Center (TAC)
- Online Student File and Student Records Policy
- Advising Awards
- LSA Handbook for Faculty and Instructional Staff
- Reference Manual for Departmental Program Advising Staff
- Liaison Handbook
- Advisor Handbook
- Academic Integrity
- Wellness at Newnan
- Undergraduate Education